Re: [eclipse-pmc] New Top Level Project Charter

["Daniel Megert" <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-1 to "workbench".
The Eclipse TLP is not just about UI/workbench, e.g. Equinox.

Dani



From:
       Mickael
Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
       eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
       02.10.2018
18:51
Subject:
       Re:
[eclipse-pmc] New Top Level Project Charter
Sent
by:        eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 6:42 PM Mike Wilson
<Mike_Wilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Well, the "Eclipse SDK" would
be the SDK for building Eclipse, wouldn't it? I guess you could say the
""Eclipse Eclipse SDK", but I'm not convinced that's better.

While "Eclipse SDK" is still
my favorite as a TLP, if we can't use it,
I'd like to suggest "Eclipse Workbench
SDK" as TLP, and allow usage of "Eclipse Workbench IDE"
to EPP.
I think the workbench has many advantages:
* it's already a term that's used technically,
in UI
* it doesn't seem like a strong rebranding,
but more like a qualifier, so adopting it seems relatively cheap and straightforward
* it allows to be suffixed with SDK and
IDE
* it is a good differentiator from other
IDEs at Eclipse. A workbench is more an individual, single user, user-tailored
tool than a team/organization-centered tool.
* It's probably fine to be trademarked

-- 
Mickael Istria
Eclipse
IDE developer, for Red
Hat Developers[attachment
"graycol.gif" deleted by Daniel Megert/Zurich/IBM] _______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc