Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build
Thanks Martin.
 
+1 from Eric Cloninger

From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 9:11 AM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

Hi Eric,
 
Formally this does need a PMC vote, would the PMC please approve TmL's re-use of Commons Net 2.0 from Orbit:
+1 from Martin Oberhuber on http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3376
 
Less formally, I just went ahead and pro-actively +1'd this on IPZilla. Note that the PMC can still revoke this, but since it's
  • just re-using Commons Net 2.0 from Orbit,
  • just updating from Commons Net 1.4.1 to Commons Net 2.0 inside TmL
it is pretty obvious that you need this. Given that time is scarce moving up to Galileo, I suspect that the minimal risk of getting a PMC -1 after the fact is smaller than losing time.
 
Anyways, would the PMC please formally vote .
 
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
 
 

From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CLONINGER ERIC-DCP874
Sent: Mittwoch, 03. Juni 2009 16:02
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

Hi Martin,
 
Do I need to do anything other than file it?  Does it need a PMC vote since this effectively replaces 3065 which was previously voted on?
 
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3376
 
Thanks
 
-E

From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:17 AM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

To make it clear, you MUST file the piggyback CQ for re-use.
There is NO CQ that would be valid for all of a toplevel project.
 
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
 
 

From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Mittwoch, 03. Juni 2009 07:29
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

No. Every project needs a piggyback CQ for their own use. It is fast and easy to do via the portal ("re-use existing...")
 
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
 
 

From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CLONINGER ERIC-DCP874
Sent: Dienstag, 02. Juni 2009 23:42
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

Martin,
 
Sharon is asking if we need to file a CQ for Commons and ORO. Fantato thought he recalled that we had a blanket CQ for these for all of DSDP, but I can't find any mention of it in the mailing list archives.
 
-E

From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:51 AM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

Hi TML,
 
as I know you are leveraging Common Net, you'll have to update to the
latest Orbit stable build for your Galileo RC1. There was a change
requested to remove the ant classpathEntries extension from Commons
Net, which I did. We need to make sure that we all use the same version
of commons net in Galileo.
 
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
 
 

Back to the top