Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

+1 from Doug Gaff.

 

Martin: thanks for pro-actively doing a +1 given the urgency on Galileo.

 

From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 10:11 AM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

 

Hi Eric,

 

Formally this does need a PMC vote, would the PMC please approve TmL's re-use of Commons Net 2.0 from Orbit:

+1 from Martin Oberhuber on http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3376

 

Less formally, I just went ahead and pro-actively +1'd this on IPZilla. Note that the PMC can still revoke this, but since it's

  • just re-using Commons Net 2.0 from Orbit,
  • just updating from Commons Net 1.4.1 to Commons Net 2.0 inside TmL

it is pretty obvious that you need this. Given that time is scarce moving up to Galileo, I suspect that the minimal risk of getting a PMC -1 after the fact is smaller than losing time.

 

Anyways, would the PMC please formally vote .

 

Cheers,

--

Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River

Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member

http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

 

 

 


From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CLONINGER ERIC-DCP874
Sent: Mittwoch, 03. Juni 2009 16:02
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

Hi Martin,

 

Do I need to do anything other than file it?  Does it need a PMC vote since this effectively replaces 3065 which was previously voted on?

 

http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3376

 

Thanks

 

-E

 


From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:17 AM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

To make it clear, you MUST file the piggyback CQ for re-use.

There is NO CQ that would be valid for all of a toplevel project.

 

Cheers,

--

Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River

Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member

http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

 

 

 


From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Mittwoch, 03. Juni 2009 07:29
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

No. Every project needs a piggyback CQ for their own use. It is fast and easy to do via the portal ("re-use existing...")

 

Cheers,

--

Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River

Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member

http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

 

 

 


From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CLONINGER ERIC-DCP874
Sent: Dienstag, 02. Juni 2009 23:42
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

Martin,

 

Sharon is asking if we need to file a CQ for Commons and ORO. Fantato thought he recalled that we had a blanket CQ for these for all of DSDP, but I can't find any mention of it in the mailing list archives.

 

-E

 


From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:51 AM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build

Hi TML,

 

as I know you are leveraging Common Net, you'll have to update to the

latest Orbit stable build for your Galileo RC1. There was a change

requested to remove the ant classpathEntries extension from Commons

Net, which I did. We need to make sure that we all use the same version

of commons net in Galileo.

 

Cheers,

--

Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River

Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member

http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

 

 


Back to the top