+1 from dave
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009
7:11 AM
To: DSDP
PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML,
you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build
Hi Eric,
Formally this does need a
PMC vote, would the PMC please approve TmL's re-use of Commons Net 2.0 from
Orbit:
+1 from
Martin Oberhuber on http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3376
Less formally, I just
went ahead and pro-actively +1'd this on IPZilla. Note that the PMC can still
revoke this, but since it's
·
just re-using
Commons Net 2.0 from Orbit,
·
just
updating from Commons Net 1.4.1 to Commons Net 2.0 inside TmL
it is pretty obvious that
you need this. Given that time is scarce moving up to Galileo, I suspect that
the minimal risk of getting a PMC -1 after the fact is smaller than losing
time.
Anyways, would the PMC
please formally vote .
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target
Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CLONINGER ERIC-DCP874
Sent: Mittwoch, 03. Juni 2009
16:02
To: DSDP
PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML,
you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build
Hi Martin,
Do I need to do anything
other than file it? Does it need a PMC vote since this effectively
replaces 3065 which was previously voted on?
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3376
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009
2:17 AM
To: DSDP
PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML,
you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build
To make it clear, you
MUST file the piggyback CQ for re-use.
There is NO CQ that would
be valid for all of a toplevel project.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target
Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Mittwoch, 03. Juni 2009
07:29
To: DSDP
PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML,
you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build
No. Every project needs a
piggyback CQ for their own use. It is fast and easy to do via the portal
("re-use existing...")
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target
Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CLONINGER ERIC-DCP874
Sent: Dienstag, 02. Juni 2009
23:42
To: DSDP
PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] TML,
you'll need to update to the latest Orbit build
Martin,
Sharon is asking if we need to file a CQ for Commons and ORO. Fantato
thought he recalled that we had a blanket CQ for these for all of DSDP, but I
can't find any mention of it in the mailing list archives.
-E
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:51 AM
To: DSDP
PMC list
Subject: [dsdp-pmc] TML, you'll
need to update to the latest Orbit build
as I know you are leveraging Common
Net, you'll have to update to the
latest Orbit stable build for your
Galileo RC1. There was a change
requested to remove the ant
classpathEntries extension from Commons
Net, which I did. We need to make
sure that we all use the same version
of commons net in Galileo.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target
Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm