From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 6:42 AM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] PMC Meeting - Thursday August 7
Hi all,
I don't think that quality of the contributions is really relevant
at this point,
since that's up to the project (and nominator) to decide. What
counts for
me is openness, transparency, and observing IP rules of engagement.
Moreover, becoming a committer is about committing Code, so at
least
one of these contributions should be some code which actually made
it into
the code base and thus shows that the contributor went through
the
IP process.
Since Bugzilla is the only allowed means of inbound contribution
(yes,
you cannot just copy & paste stuff from the mailing list into
CVS -
see Figure
11 on http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf
I'm in favor of requiring one bugzilla.
There's a corner case in Figure
2 of the Legal poster (contributors from
same company under supervision of the pmc don't need bugzilla). But
since this corner case is neither Open nor Transparent, I'm in
favor
of requiring bugzilla also in this case.
All this being said, what about this wording:
Committer Nominations must reference at least 3 publicly
visible
records of contribution. At least one of these must be a patch in
bugzilla on behalf of the nominating project.
References should be by means of hyperlink (URL) for easy review,
and can be mailing list, wiki or newsgroup contributions.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of
Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Rogalski
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 2:42 AM
To: DSDP PMC list
Cc: DSDP PMC list; dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] PMC Meeting - Thursday August 7
I like it with
the following adjustments:
Candidate
should have 3 good records of contribution: patches in bugzilla, good
mailing list, wiki or news group contributions. One contribution must be from
the nominating project.
|
"Gaff,
Doug" <doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
08/07/2008
09:45 AM
|
Please respond to
DSDP PMC list <dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"DSDP
PMC list" <dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
RE:
[dsdp-pmc] PMC Meeting - Thursday August 7
|
|
Minutes
updated. Thanks again for the progress on the project plans.
Here
is our proposal for future committer votes:
Propose
3 good records of contribution: patches in bugzilla, good mailing list
contributions. Ok if one of those records is from another project.
Is
this what we agreed to?
Action
items:
Mark:
Convert his eRCP plan slides to XML format by end of August
All:
Finish project plans by Aug 31 so we can review in Sept meeting.
ALL:
Complete the drafts of Board Report by end of August. Word document.
Mark:
Check with Uriel to see if he's going to submit a paper to ESE.
Christian:
Submit an ESE talk - could cover MTJ and TmL or Eclipse in Mobile.
Dave:
Submit an ESE talk.
Doug:
create the DSDP incubator and build the initial website.
Dave:
Contact Eclipse legal about best terms of use for their vserver wiki.
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gaff,
Doug
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 1:02 PM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: [dsdp-pmc] PMC Meeting - Thursday August 7
Hi folks,
I’ve updated
the agenda for the meeting.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/PMC/PMC_Minutes_7Aug08
Please add
anything else you’d like to talk about. If you cannot attend, please let the
group know.
The most
important action item is a first draft of your project plan to review prior to
the meeting. Please link it in the portal so that we can view them rendered,
e.g.
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=dsdp.tm
Doug_______________________________________________
dsdp-pmc mailing list
dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
