[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [dsdp-pmc] PMC Meeting - Thursday August 7
|
Hi all,
I don't think that quality of the contributions is really
relevant at this point,
since that's up to the project (and nominator) to decide.
What counts for
me is openness, transparency, and observing IP rules of
engagement.
Moreover, becoming a committer is about committing
Code, so at least
one of these contributions should be some code which
actually made it into
the code base and thus shows that the contributor
went through the
IP process.
Since Bugzilla is the only allowed means of inbound
contribution (yes,
you cannot just copy & paste stuff from the mailing
list into CVS -
I'm in favor of requiring one bugzilla.
There's a corner case in Figure 2 of the Legal poster (contributors
from
same company under
supervision of the pmc don't need bugzilla).
But
since this corner case is neither Open nor Transparent, I'm
in favor
of requiring bugzilla also in this
case.
All this being said, what about this
wording:
Committer Nominations must reference at
least 3 publicly visible
records of contribution. At
least one of these must be a patch in
bugzilla on behalf of the nominating
project.
References should be by means of hyperlink (URL) for easy
review,
and can be mailing list,
wiki or newsgroup contributions.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical
Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project
Lead, DSDP PMC Member
I like it with the following
adjustments:
Candidate should have 3 good records of contribution:
patches in bugzilla, good mailing list, wiki or news group contributions. One
contribution must be from the nominating project.
"Gaff, Doug"
<doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
08/07/2008 09:45 AM
|
Please respond
to
DSDP PMC list
<dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "DSDP PMC list"
<dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [dsdp-pmc] PMC Meeting -
Thursday August 7 |
|
Minutes updated. Thanks again for the
progress on the project plans.
Here is
our proposal for future committer votes:
Propose 3 good records of contribution: patches in bugzilla, good
mailing list contributions. Ok if one of those records is from another
project.
Is this
what we agreed to?
Action
items:
Mark: Convert his eRCP plan
slides to XML format by end of August
All: Finish project plans by Aug 31 so we can review
in Sept meeting.
ALL: Complete the drafts of Board Report by end of August. Word
document.
Mark:
Check with Uriel to see if he's going to submit a paper to ESE.
Christian: Submit an ESE
talk - could cover MTJ and TmL or Eclipse in Mobile.
Dave: Submit an ESE talk.
Doug: create the DSDP
incubator and build the initial website.
Dave: Contact Eclipse legal about best terms of use
for their vserver wiki.
From:
dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gaff, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, August 05,
2008 1:02 PM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: [dsdp-pmc] PMC
Meeting - Thursday August 7
Hi folks,
I’ve updated the agenda for the meeting.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/PMC/PMC_Minutes_7Aug08
Please add anything else you’d like to talk about. If you cannot
attend, please let the group know.
The most important
action item is a first draft of your project plan to review prior to the
meeting. Please link it in the portal so that we can view them rendered,
e.g.
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=dsdp.tm
Doug_______________________________________________
dsdp-pmc mailing
list
dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
