Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [epp-dev] m2e ponders participation in luna

I don't have *the* solution at hand, but Wayne's and others idea of graduating these projects seems to be the best way to move forward - given that a graduation is possible. Both projects are included in another project (m2e) and this is one sign of maturity.
The IP deadline needs to be discussed with Janet and team, but from my experience they will try to help as good as they can.


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Igor Fedorenko <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What is your suggestion?

BTW, I didn't even realize m2e was part of RCP/RAP package :-)


On 12/16/2013, 13:16, Markus Knauer wrote:
I cannot speak for them but m2e is included in my RCP/RAP package, too.
I don't like the idea of having to use an "Incubation" label on my
package, and I am sure that the Java and Java EE package maintainers
have a similar opinion.


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Igor Fedorenko <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 12/16/2013, 12:45, Wayne Beaton wrote:

        The submission deadline is the deadline for all CQs. The May
        was for IP log submission.

        I agree that if Sisu and Aether have both been adopted by a release
        version of Maven, that this is a pretty clear indication that
        they are
        mature technology.

        Have the Sisu and Aether projects been contacted regarding
        I'd love to hear their opinion regarding their readiness.

        If, theoretically, we could get Sisu and Aether to graduate
        early in the
        new year, is it possible to create a new release of Maven based
        on the
        1.0 code in time for the simultaneous release?

        FWIW, if m2e depends on the specific version of Maven that
        includes Sisu
        and Aether, including that version of Maven in the project downloads
        means that the downloads must be marked as "incubating". By
        any Eclipse package that includes m2e would have to be
        Note that this does not mean that m2e itself needs to be moved
        back into
        an Incubation phase.

    What do "java" and "java ee" epp package maintainers think about
    "incubating" label?


    cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
    <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> <>

epp-dev mailing list

epp-dev mailing list

Back to the top