Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] m2e ponders participation in luna

Wasn't there another deadline in February for new CQ submissions?


On 12/16/2013, 9:36, Matthias Sohn wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Igor Fedorenko <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 12/16/2013, 4:16, Mike Milinkovich wrote:

        On 15/12/2013 11:06 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:

            Problem is, maven 3.1.x includes Eclipse Aether and
            Eclipse Sisu binaries, both currently under incubation as
            technology project.

        What I don't understand is that if these projects are mature
        enough to
        be included in production versions of Maven, why don't you
        simply ask
        the projects to do a Release Review to get to Mature status?
        It's not
        that much work.

    I am not sure if the two projects pass "diversity" criterion, see [1]
    and [2] git stats for example.

    Even if the two projects do get their respective "mature" release in
    next few weeks, this will not give us enough time to integrate them into
    Maven, release new version of Maven and integrate the new version of
    Maven into m2e before Luna IP deadline, which I assume is in two months
    or so.


last year the IP log deadline for Kepler was on May 24


cross-project-issues-dev mailing list

Back to the top