[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] m2e ponders participation in luna

Wasn't there another deadline in February for new CQ submissions?

--
Regards,
Igor

On 12/16/2013, 9:36, Matthias Sohn wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Igor Fedorenko <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:



    On 12/16/2013, 4:16, Mike Milinkovich wrote:

        On 15/12/2013 11:06 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:

            Problem is, maven 3.1.x includes Eclipse Aether and
            Eclipse Sisu binaries, both currently under incubation as
            eclipse
            technology project.


What I don't understand is that if these projects are mature enough to be included in production versions of Maven, why don't you simply ask the projects to do a Release Review to get to Mature status? It's not that much work.


I am not sure if the two projects pass "diversity" criterion, see [1] and [2] git stats for example.

    Even if the two projects do get their respective "mature" release in
    next few weeks, this will not give us enough time to integrate them into
    Maven, release new version of Maven and integrate the new version of
    Maven into m2e before Luna IP deadline, which I assume is in two months
    or so.

    [1]
    http://git.eclipse.org/c/__aether/aether-core.git/stats/?__period=q&ofs=10
    <http://git.eclipse.org/c/aether/aether-core.git/stats/?period=q&ofs=10>
    [2]
    http://git.eclipse.org/c/sisu/__org.eclipse.sisu.inject.git/__stats/?period=q&ofs=10
    <http://git.eclipse.org/c/sisu/org.eclipse.sisu.inject.git/stats/?period=q&ofs=10>


last year the IP log deadline for Kepler was on May 24 http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg08897.html

--
Matthias


_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev