Re: [cdt-patch] Patch for 69711

["Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>]

> 
> I have to admit that I'm not that familiar with CVS terms (I'm more used to
> ClearCase). Does "head" mean that the patch will be included in CD 2.0.1 or
> CDT 2.1?

The patch was applied to the head, the stream that will be use for the 2.1 candidate.

> I think that the patch would be suitable for inclusion in both CDT
> 2.0.1 and CDT 2.1 since it does not change any API.
> 

Noted.

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>
> To: <cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 7:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [cdt-patch] Patch for 69711
> 
> 
> > >
> > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> > > --------------040504080606050709080706
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > >
> > > This is a patch for 69711, which adds support for thread names in the
> > > CDT debug view.
> > > See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=69711 for more
> > > information.
> > >
> >
> > Done in the head.
> > The PR did not make it clear if you want it to be in the 2.0_branch also.
> > It should be ok(altough it is a feature) since it does not change any API.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-patch mailing list
> > cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-patch mailing list
> cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch
> 


-- 
au revoir, alain
----
Aussi haut que l'on soit assis, on est toujours assis que sur son cul !!!