[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-patch] Patch for 69711
|
I have to admit that I'm not that familiar with CVS terms (I'm more used to
ClearCase). Does "head" mean that the patch will be included in CD 2.0.1 or
CDT 2.1? I think that the patch would be suitable for inclusion in both CDT
2.0.1 and CDT 2.1 since it does not change any API.
/Stefan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>
To: <cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [cdt-patch] Patch for 69711
> >
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> > --------------040504080606050709080706
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> > This is a patch for 69711, which adds support for thread names in the
> > CDT debug view.
> > See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=69711 for more
> > information.
> >
>
> Done in the head.
> The PR did not make it clear if you want it to be in the 2.0_branch also.
> It should be ok(altough it is a feature) since it does not change any API.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-patch mailing list
> cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch
>
