Re: [cdt-patch] Patch for 69711

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-patch] Patch for 69711

From: "Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:35:44 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-to: cdt-patch@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/cdt-patch/>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-patch-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch>, <mailto:cdt-patch-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-patch>, <mailto:cdt-patch-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> 
> I have to admit that I'm not that familiar with CVS terms (I'm more used to
> ClearCase). Does "head" mean that the patch will be included in CD 2.0.1 or
> CDT 2.1? I think that the patch would be suitable for inclusion in both CDT
> 2.0.1 and CDT 2.1 since it does not change any API.

Done.

References:
- Re: [cdt-patch] Patch for 69711
  - From: Stefan Bylund

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-patch] Patch for 69711
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-patch] Patch: another releng patch
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-patch] Patch for 69711
Next by thread: [cdt-patch] WinDbg NATIVE defines have wrong package name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs