Re: [cdt-dev] Is CMake support stable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] Is CMake support stable?

From: Liviu Ionescu <ilg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:30:34 +0200
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 9 Dec 2020, at 06:25, Marc-Andre Laperle <malaperle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> This way (Makefile+MBS) works for any external builder

What you basically say is that we cannot get rid of MBS yet? 

How do you pass the compile_commands.json to the indexer?

---

I'm ready to do some programming to integrate my new builder into Eclipse, but I would like a more future proof solution, and I hoped that the new builder support may help, but apparently we're not yet there.

Regards,

Liviu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Is CMake support stable?
  - From: Marc-Andre Laperle

References:
- [cdt-dev] Is CMake support stable?
  - From: Liviu Ionescu
- Re: [cdt-dev] Is CMake support stable?
  - From: 15 knots
- Re: [cdt-dev] Is CMake support stable?
  - From: Liviu Ionescu
- Re: [cdt-dev] Is CMake support stable?
  - From: Martin Weber
- Re: [cdt-dev] Is CMake support stable?
  - From: Liviu Ionescu
- Re: [cdt-dev] Is CMake support stable?
  - From: Marc-Andre Laperle

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Is CMake support stable?
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Are managed projects a requirement/recommendation or the new build system is enough?
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Is CMake support stable?
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Is CMake support stable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs