Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"

Why are there dependencies on gdb specific plugins for the generic disassembly view?  Shouldn't those plugins only contain gdb specifics?  We don't typically bundle any gnu specific parts of CDT with our products since we don't use any gnu tools.  That's the reason they're in separate plugins afterall.
As far as the view being in DSF vs CDT core, it doesn't matter that much to me since we'll be shipping a DSF debugger.  Our existing products based on CDT 6.0 only have a CDI debugger and we do no bundle DSF with those.  I'm not sure if any vendors will have that scenario with CDT 7.0.

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Madan Teodor-TEMADAN1
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 10:19 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"

For viewer to work with CDI there're the following dependencies:
1. /org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.ui - the actual DSF viewer and its dependencies org.eclipse.cdt.dsf,  org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb
2. org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.ui - for IToggleBreakpointsTargetExtension and IMoveToLineTarget/ IResumeAtLineTarget / IRunToLineTarget adapters

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Warren.Paul@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:06 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"

Given the view is still in DSF, why would we move the prefs out of the DSP plugin?

Well, if it's shared between DSF and CDI, then it's really not a DSF feature and I would assume it would be in org.eclipse.cdt.debug.ui.  Is DSF required in CDT 7.0 or can vendors ship without it if they're only using CDI? 

Back to the top