[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"
|
We are actively working on retrofitting the DSF Disassemby view to work
with CDI, thus making the non-DSF one obsolete. If we are successful,
this will address your concern, since there will only be one
view.
John
At 04:16 PM 1/13/2010, Mehregani, Navid wrote:
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_496565EC904933469F292DDA3F1663E602AA31150Cdlee06enttico_"
Hello,
Ive used activities to hide CDIs Disassembly view. Our product is
only shipped with DSF Disassembly view. However, our users dont
know or care about DSF. Im sure most CDT users (not developers)
really know what DSF/CDI is.
At first I thought about hiding the DSF Disassembly view via activities
and redefining it with a new name, but that doesnt work since
DisassemblyView class is in an internal package thats not
exported. I assume the community wouldnt want to export this
package? I obviously dont want to duplicate the code in
DisassemblyView and DisassemblyPart.
Does anyone else have this problem? Does it make sense to rename DSF
Disassembly to something that would be a bit more meaningful to CDT
users? (similar to Memory and Memory Browser views).
Thanks for your help,
- Navid
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev