Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"

Hi John,


Is this planned for CDT 7.0? Is there a bugzilla entry for it?




From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Cortell
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 5:19 PM
To: CDT General developers list.; cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"


We are actively working on retrofitting the DSF Disassemby view to work with CDI, thus making the non-DSF one obsolete. If we are successful, this will address your concern, since there will only be one view.


At 04:16 PM 1/13/2010, Mehregani, Navid wrote:

Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

Ive used activities to hide CDIs Disassembly view.  Our product is only shipped with DSF Disassembly view.  However, our users dont know or care about DSF.  Im sure most CDT users (not developers) really know what DSF/CDI is.
At first I thought about hiding the DSF Disassembly view via activities and redefining it with a new name, but that doesnt work since DisassemblyView class is in an internal package thats not exported.  I assume the community wouldnt want to export this package?  I obviously dont want to duplicate the code in DisassemblyView and DisassemblyPart. 
Does anyone else have this problem? Does it make sense to rename DSF Disassembly to something that would be a bit more meaningful to CDT users? (similar to Memory and Memory Browser views). 
Thanks for your help,
- Navid
cdt-dev mailing list

Back to the top