[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [udig-devel] Introducing the CNF to the SDK
|
Small note.
I think I could add CNF only to the SDK; and not to the download app; I will try this morning and let you know.
Many of the other activity you see is neatly split between new functionality (ie a FeatureView) this development is occurring in a plugin that is not included in the sample application; and javadocs as I go through and understand how the wizards work etc...
Jody
On 20/04/2010, at 9:09 PM, andrea antonello wrote:
>> Indeed Andrea:
>>
>> I am not very pleased; we did discuss a couple weeks ago this issue on IRC.
>>
>> The result of which is that the last 1.2.0 RC2 is tagged; and represents our best starting place for a 1.2.x branch.
>>
>> There was a small number of problems with 1.2.0 RC2 preventing it from being great.
>> - H2 database was getting stuck for max and linux users (now fixed!)
>> - Missing a "What is New" documentation page
>> - missing linux 64 jre (now fixed?)
>> - missing a mac installer
>>
>> I am not going to be able to return to the topic myself until next month; as such I have not been pestering anyone about a 1.2.0 timeframe.
>> I suspect we will choose to branch from RC2 and port across select patches from trunk.
>
> But should then shouldn't the trunk activities be tagged as something
> that tells people that it will not go into the 1.2 release? i.e.
> something different than 1.2RCn?
>
> I was expecting that a branch would have been created to bring on the
> 1.2 stabilization. Instead the 1.2RC development goes on with new
> development that should not be part of 1.2.
>
> Andrea
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Jody
>>
>> On 20/04/2010, at 7:36 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>>
>>> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>>>> You are correct - the RC process has failed as the PSC was not able to
>>>> get 1.2.0 out in time.
>>>
>>> I know I'm not PSC or even developer, but what's wrong is just noticing
>>> the RC phase has started, branching, and leaving trunk for wild new
>>> developments while the branch is used for bug fixes until release?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrea Aime
>>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>>> Expert service straight from the developers.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>>> http://udig.refractions.net
>>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>> http://udig.refractions.net
>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
