I approve for the Tools PMC.
From: Anne Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05,
2007 4:07 PM
To: Tom Grosman
Cc: Doug
Schaefer
Subject: Re: Scheduling of ADT
Project Creation Review
Tom, I thought I would
check with you to see how you are doing with getting ready for your Creation
Review. There are two things that need to be in place no later than Monday, Sept. 10:
1. PMC approval for your review (an e-mail from a member of the Tools
PMC will suffice for this)
2. Your finalized docuware for the review - I would suggest sending in
a draft ASAP, because history has shown that we often need to do two or three
rounds before the slides are done. I sent you some more detailed information
earlier about things to be sure to include. I can re-send that info if you need
it.
Please let me know if you have any questions--thanks.
On Aug 22, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Tom Grosman wrote:
Anne-
Here is the updated list of mentors and
initial committers for the proposal page.
Mentors-
Doug Schaefer (Tools PMC,
CDT Project Lead, QNX)
Doug Gaff (DSDP PMC Lead, Windriver)
Committers-
Tom Grosman (Project
Lead, Aonix) grosman@xxxxxxxx
Adam Haselhuhn (Aonix) haselhuhn@xxxxxxxxx
Lisa Jett, (DDC-I) ljett@xxxxxxxx
Quentin Ochem (AdaCore) ochem@xxxxxxxxxxx
Pat Rogers (AdaCore) rogers@xxxxxxxxxxx
Regards,
-Tom
---------------------------------------------
Tom GROSMAN, Aonix France
De : Anne
Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé :
Tuesday, August 21, 2007 6:46 PM
À :
Tom Grosman
Cc :
Doug
Schaefer; Doug Gaff
Objet :
Re: Scheduling of ADT Project Creation Review
Thanks, Tom, I've noted that the two Dougs
will be your official mentors. Their names should be added to the proposal.
Do you have any more specific names of
initial committers? If we're going to update the proposal with the mentor
names, we might as well add all new information that you have at this point. I
am happy to add this for you, or you could send me a new version of your
index.php file if you like.
If there are no other changes and you want
me to do the update, under "Organization" I would create a header for
"Project Mentors" and add Doug S. and Doug G. there, along with their
Eclipse affiliations (DSDP PMC Lead for Doug G., Tools PMC and CDT PL for Doug S.)
and their e-mail addresses. We should also add e-mail addresses for you and for
Adam (and for any new people that get added).
On Aug 21, 2007, at 3:16 AM, Tom
Grosman wrote:
Anne and
Doug,
Sorry, I was away on
vacation last week and was unable to respond to you emails.
I have asked Doug Gaff to
act as our second mentor. He has indicated he would be willing to do so. I will
be talking to him this week to dot the i’s and cross the t’s.
Thanks,
Tom
---------------------------------------------
Tom GROSMAN,
Aonix France
De : Anne
Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé :
Tuesday, August 14, 2007 3:21 AM
À :
Doug Schaefer
Cc :
Tom
Grosman
Objet :
Re: Scheduling of ADT Project Creation Review
Doug, as far as I know that only thing
that has happened is that Bjorn explained to Oliver and Tom why Oliver couldn't
be one of the two official project mentors. I will wait until Tom has a chance
to arrange for two other mentors, one of which I would guess it likely to be
you? Thanks for checking.
On Aug 13, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Doug Schaefer
wrote:
Has there
been progress on the Mentor
front lately (sorry I was on vacation last week and lost track)? We need two. I
assume I am one of them. Let me know if you need a recommendation. I know a few
people on the council that might fit well.
Cheers,
From: Anne
Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:
Friday, August 10, 2007 2:13 PM
To: Tom
Grosman
Cc: 'Doug Schaefer'; 'Oliver E Cole'
Subject:
Re: Scheduling of ADT Project Creation Review
Hi Tom,
I've made a note on the calendar that
you'd like the September 17 date. That means that you final docuware is due by
September 10. As suggested earlier, having the draft docuware sent in by
September 3 would be a great idea.
Unfortunately, Oliver
Cole is not a member of the Architecture
Council, so I'm not sure that Bjorn will OK him as one of your two required
mentors. Not that Oliver wouldn't be an excellent mentor, but projects are
required to have two mentors who are on the Architecture Council, with rare
exception. Here's more info about this:
Please let me know if you have any
questions--thanks.
On Aug 10, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Tom
Grosman wrote:
Hi
Anne,
Monday the 17th is fine with me (8am
PT). Oliver
Cole (PMC TPTP and COSMOS) has agreed to be a
mentor for the project.
Regards,
Tom
---------------------------------------------
Tom GROSMAN,
Aonix France
De : Anne
Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé :
Wednesday, August 08, 2007 6:20 PM
À :
Tom
Grosman
Cc :
'Doug Schaefer'
Objet :
Re: Scheduling of ADT Project Creation Review
Hi Tom (cc Doug),
We are happy to schedule a creation review
for you. Please see below for some information you might find useful about
preparing for the review call.
We should figure out which day will work
for you. September is proving a bit hard to schedule in the normal way because
of travel and vacations. Currently I have a date open on Monday, Sept. 17 at
8am PT and you could have your review call then. If that won't work, we'll work
on finding a date in the first week in September. Just let me know--thanks.
----------------------------
1) PMC approval for the review (via e-mail to EMO, emo@xxxxxxxxxxx)
and 2) the final version of the review docuware. These items are due at least
one week before the review conference call date.
Helpful
documents: The section of the
Eclipse Development Process document that briefly describes Creation Reviews is
here:
Review
docuware: Many people
underestimate the time and effort needed to create the docuware, so please be
sure to allow enough time for this task. The "official" due date for
the docuware is one week before the review call (T - one week). However, the
docuware needs to be reviewed by the EMO before posting. If you wait until the
due date to submit the first draft and the EMO requests changes, then you'll
probably miss your deadline and your review will be postponed. We strongly suggest this timeline for submitting docuware:
T - two weeks: submit first draft via e-mail to EMO
T - 10 days: submit final draft
T - one week (due date): EMO posts final version on
website before announcing review call
Please note that that we need both a vendor-neutral
format file (PDF) and the source format that you used to create it; we archive
both versions.
Many projects overlook these items when they do their
first draft:
- page (slide) numbers
- copyright notice
- EPL notice
- mentor names
- committer bios
The committer bios don't have to be long or involved,
but they should describe each committer's relationship to and history with the
incoming code, and/or involvement with the area or technologies covered by the
proposal. This document - http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/maya/maya_creation_review.pdf - includes some
good examples of committer bios.
The docuware should also include the Bugzilla URL for
the bug we use for comments and voting. The EMO will open this bug when you
submit the first draft of the docuware and supply the URL for inclusion in
subsequent versions.
-------------------------------
On Aug 7, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Tom
Grosman wrote:
Hello,
I would like to schedule a project creation review for the
Hibachi project. I believe we are in a good position now to create a viable
Eclipse project that will complement existing projects.
I understand that creation reviews are held on Wednesdays. I
suggest the first Wednesday in September if that is available.
Best Regards,
Tom
GROSMAN
|