| Re: [science-pmc] TeXlipse will probably not make the release |
Wayne, Doing as you requested I’ve added «This is a WORKSWITH request» as a comment when the source code is requested, it keeps bouncing asking for the source, so I’ll just leave it at that for now. Best regards, Torkild > 27. sep. 2017 kl. 22:27 skrev Torkild U. Resheim <torkildr@xxxxxxxxx>: > > Well, the IP-team is not going to thank me for this. I found several esoteric licenses in this list: Knuth License, GPL and possibly something else, LPPL, Affero GPL, Free. Another problem is that one cannot select "build and test dependency" or WORKWITH when creating the CQ. > > I have filed CQs for all these packages and binaries > > * biber – https://sourceforge.net/projects/biblatex-biber/files/ - CQ14345 - GPL3 > * bibtex - https://www.ctan.org/pkg/bibtex - CQ14346 - Knuth License > * dvipdf - http://tug.org/texinfohtml/dvips.htm - CQ14344 - GPL2 > * dvips - http://tug.org/texinfohtml/dvips.html - CQ14344 - Public Domain /GPL2/3 > * LaTeX - https://www.latex-project.org - CQ14343 - LPPL > * makeindex - https://www.ctan.org/pkg/makeindex - CQ14347 - Free > * ps2pdf - https://www.ghostscript.com - CQ14343 - Affero GPL > > I hope that is all. > > Best regards, > Torkild >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP