Re: [science-pmc] TeXlipse will probably not make the release

["Torkild U. Resheim" <torkildr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Well, the IP-team is not going to thank me for this. I found several esoteric licenses in this list: Knuth License, GPL and possibly something else, LPPL, Affero GPL, Free. Another problem is that one cannot select "build and test dependency" or WORKWITH when creating the CQ.

I have filed CQs for all these packages and binaries

* biber – https://sourceforge.net/projects/biblatex-biber/files/ - CQ14345 - GPL3
* bibtex - https://www.ctan.org/pkg/bibtex - CQ14346 - Knuth License
* dvipdf - http://tug.org/texinfohtml/dvips.htm - CQ14344 - GPL2
* dvips - http://tug.org/texinfohtml/dvips.html - CQ14344 - Public Domain /GPL2/3
* LaTeX - https://www.latex-project.org - CQ14343 - LPPL
* makeindex - https://www.ctan.org/pkg/makeindex - CQ14347 - Free
* ps2pdf - https://www.ghostscript.com - CQ14343 - Affero GPL

I hope that is all.

Best regards,
Torkild

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP