Re: [paho-dev] Mosquitto project proposal

[Roger Light <roger@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ian,

That sounds like a good idea, I'm not sure it needs to go in the
proposal though.

Cheers,

Roger



On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Ian Craggs
<icraggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> what I would suggest though, and would like to add to the proposal, is that
> there is something like an "mqtt_standard_behaviour" switch, which overrides
> other settings, so that you can easily use Mosquitto in conformance tests
> without having to remember n individual settings.
>
> Ian
>
>
> On 19/09/13 21:48, Roger Light wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> It looks ok to me. I certainly wouldn't want to preclude non-standard
>> behaviour though, bridging comes under that at the moment as do at
>> least three other features in mosquitto ;)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Roger
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Ian Craggs
>> <icraggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've responded to all the comments on the proposal draft.   How does
>>> everyone feel about it now?
>>>
>>> I added this statement in the scope section:
>>>
>>> Mosquitto adheres to the standards as closely as possible, so it may be
>>> used
>>> as a reference server.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure about the second clause of that sentence, whether it's a
>>> good
>>> idea or not. I thought about adding "in its default configuration", to
>>> allow
>>> for non-standard behaviour to be optional. I'm not sure whether stating
>>> the
>>> aim to be a reference server would open us up to any legal trickiness.
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> paho-dev mailing list
>>> paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> paho-dev mailing list
>> paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev
>
>