AFAIK, *Oracle JDK 11* will be LTS, but at that point, only OpenJDK will remain free (which won't hace LTS).
So it's not Java 11 that will be LTS, but some specific implementations.
Btw, IBM already announced they plan to offer free LTS support for Eclipse OpenJ9 11.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
2018-03-29 19:55 GMT+02:00 Markus KARG <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
I think it would be a good thing to use Java 10 for 3.0 and Java 8 for 2.2. The reason is that people would think they can drop-in 2.2 where currently 2.1 runs -- which is Java EE 8 containers.
-Markus
Hi all,
I'm currently preparing the Travis CI configuration. As part of that, we have to decide against which java versions we want to run the build. Please note that we can run multiple builds against different versions in parallel.
I just had a look at the pom and I'm a bit confused about this part. If I read it correctly, the source code version is basically set to the version of the executing JDK. Does this make sense? It seems a bit weird. Isn't the source (and target) version usually the minimum Java version supported?
_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev
_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev
_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev