Great, thanks! :-) To amend Santiag's answer: I don't know if it is possible, but we could at least ask the EMO to add another *initial* contributor, because you are the JSR 370 EG's replacement for Bill Burke, so this might be possible. -Markus From: jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alessio Soldano Sent: Dienstag, 27. Februar 2018 12:31 To: jaxrs developer discussions Subject: Re: [jaxrs-dev] JAX-RS Official Vendor Contacts For Red Hat / RESTEasy, you can use my contact, @asoldano . This said, I'd like some of my colleagues (RESTEasy committers) to have the same voice as me; I'm inviting them to join the list and discussion here soon. Btw, given the https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.jaxrs/who has been mentioned above, what's the process for being added there? Cheers Alessio On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Andy McCright <j.andrew.mccright@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Markus, I think that is fine. Ultimately, I'd rather somebody else from the CXF community be the "official" spokesperson - mainly because IBM pays me, and I don't want to make decisions for the CXF community that are preferential to IBM - I would rather avoid any conflict-of-interest scenarios. For now, I can try to represent both IBM and CXF, but if somebody else from the CXF community would like to the official CXF representative, I'd prefer that. On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Markus KARG <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Andy, would it be ok that we simply add you as a reviewer for discussion for which we need an "official" CXF voice? I mean, we cannot ask the complete CXF team but need to get definitive answers… -Markus I guess you could say that I represent IBM and Apache CXF (my GitHub ID is andymc12), but I agree with Dennis that CXF should be referenced as a community/team rather than a specific contributor. On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst <mail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Markus,
for CXF we have a GitHub team, so you could use: @apache/cxf-committers
Regards Dennis
Am 25.02.2018 um 13:19 schrieb Markus KARG:
Fellow Committers, there are some issues open in the Github issue tracker for which it would be good to get official vendor statements. With "vendor" here I mean: Vendors of JAX-RS Runtimes. Certainly all committers have the same permissions and priority, but for some issues / PRs it is just clear that contributors should at least address those people first, as the PR might have direct impact on their products, or would be worthless without their approval. To be able to actively invite the right people into these discussions / add them as reviewers on PRs it would be great to know: What are the Github user names of the official JAX-RS-Implementor committers? For Jersey, I already know that @spericas is Santiago. IBM, Red Hat, Apache, Amazon, etc. please speak up: Whic Github user names shall we understand as "JAX-RS Runtime Vendors" in such cross-vendor PRs? Thanks! -Markus _______________________________________________ jaxrs-dev mailing list jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev
_______________________________________________ jaxrs-dev mailing list jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev
_______________________________________________ jaxrs-dev mailing list jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev
_______________________________________________ jaxrs-dev mailing list jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev
|