Re: [ee4j-community] Tomitribe commitment to EE4J

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ee4j-community] Tomitribe commitment to EE4J

From: David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 10:06:51 -0700
Delivered-to: ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j-community>
List-help: <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community>, <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ee4j-community>, <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Oct 14, 2017, at 3:19 AM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As in MicroProfile https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.microprofile/who it's relatively easy to measure commitment by looking at which participants (corporate or individual) contributed how much.

At the moment Red Hat and IBM do the lion share, followed by a couple of individuals and Payara. Tomitribe contributed about 2% in recent months.

I don't think you can measure just by commits.

Scott, would you say the JWT spec is 2% better due to my participation?

-David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ee4j-community] Tomitribe commitment to EE4J
  - From: Scott Stark
- Re: [ee4j-community] Tomitribe commitment to EE4J
  - From: werner.keil

References:
- Re: [ee4j-community] Tomitribe commitment to EE4J
  - From: Werner Keil

Prev by Date: Re: [ee4j-community] Just for application servers?
Next by Date: Re: [ee4j-community] Tomitribe commitment to EE4J
Previous by thread: Re: [ee4j-community] Tomitribe commitment to EE4J
Next by thread: Re: [ee4j-community] Tomitribe commitment to EE4J
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs