Re: [ee4j-community] Tomitribe commitment to EE4J

[Scott Stark <sstark@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The commits are the minor element in a spec such as JWT where design and interop concerns dominate. David, John, Chunlong made significant contributions to those concerns without associated commits, so I'm not sure what the point of referencing the commit level is as it is not the most important benchmark of participation.

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 10:06 AM, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Oct 14, 2017, at 3:19 AM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As in MicroProfile https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.microprofile/who it's relatively easy to measure commitment by looking at which participants (corporate or individual) contributed how much.

At the moment Red Hat and IBM do the lion share, followed by a couple of individuals and Payara. Tomitribe contributed about 2% in recent months.

I don't think you can measure just by commits.

Scott, would you say the JWT spec is 2% better due to my participation?

-David