Re: [ecf-dev] DS for ResourceRepresentations

[Holger Staudacher <hstaudacher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thats a good point. I think we should use the lowest set of  
requirements because the rest api will be a public api. Is there any  
way to use both ways? I'm not an expert in DS.

Regards Holger



Am 08.08.2009 um 19:54 schrieb Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Hi Andre,
>
> dietisheim@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Hi Scott
> >
> > I'm posting to the list as I thought it'd would be better to  
> > discuss this
> > on the list instead of the bugzilla. I'm still not sure to 100%  
> > that I
> > understood your reaquirements completely.
> > The current implementation in my patch uses DS but it does not 3rd  
> > party
> > resource representations to depend on DS. The factory itself needs DS
> > sartet and depends on it. Would you like that the whole system does  
> > not
> > depend on DS or just the new resource representation?.
>
> Just for everyone's reference the bug is:
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=285294
>
> My request/requirement is that the resource representation  
> customization be possible/usable without having DS started/running  
> or even installed.  What I would like to avoid is for someone not  
> using/not wanting to use DS, that they can still customize the  
> resource representation handling.
> I don't have any objections to DS per se (in fact, I'm a big  
> believer in it...and user of it).  But I would like the entire REST  
> API work to be usable by folks that don't have/don't want to have DS  
> (i.e. they can use it if they wish, but don't have to use it to get  
> the value from the REST API).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ecf-dev mailing list
> ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev