Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE

[Rudy De Busscher <rdebusscher@xxxxxxxxx>]

>And what is the justification for requiring a namespace change?

Since MicroProfile will continue to evolve the specifications. Following example

When Jakarta EE 10  'uses' MicroProfile Config 2.0 and MP 5.0 will contain MicroProfile Config 3.0.  How can a runtime have support for Jakarta EE 10 AND MP 5.0 as it will contain double and conflicting classes?

Rudy

On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 20:31, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:13 PM Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The MP working group is not at all open to discussing the possibility of identifying a small subset of MP that can be considered for maintaining in a backwards compatible way moving forward?

Wasn't it originally the case that pretty much all APIs that are now in MP, would have been in EE?

Kind regards,

Arjan

 

_______________________________________________
cn4j-alliance mailing list
cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance