Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE

From: arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:31:09 +0100
Delivered-to: cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cn4j-alliance/>
List-help: <mailto:cn4j-alliance-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance>, <mailto:cn4j-alliance-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cn4j-alliance>, <mailto:cn4j-alliance-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:13 PM Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The MP working group is not at all open to discussing the possibility of identifying a small subset of MP that can be considered for maintaining in a backwards compatible way moving forward?

Wasn't it originally the case that pretty much all APIs that are now in MP, would have been in EE?

Kind regards,

Arjan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE
  - From: Rudy De Busscher
- Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE
  - From: Scott Stark

References:
- Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE
  - From: Rudy De Busscher
- Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE
  - From: Thomas Watson

Prev by Date: Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE
Next by Date: Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE
Previous by thread: Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE
Next by thread: Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs