Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [wtp-releng] Status of 3.1 M2?

JSF Tools: Released 3.0.2 fixes for 3.1 M2 build.


From: David M Williams [mailto:david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 11:41 AM
To: Webtools releng discussion list
Subject: RE: [wtp-releng] Status of 3.1 M2?


I think this is a good idea, this time. So looks like there will be another S-build that only JSF will smoke test ... probably won't be finished until approx 9 PM Easter ... so we'll promote, hopefully, late tonight or Saturday.

Thanks Raghu,


Raghunathan Srinivasan <raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>


Webtools releng discussion list <wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>


09/26/2008 12:45 PM


RE: [wtp-releng] Status of 3.1 M2?


Sorry, I didn’t release some of the changes in 3.0.2 to 3.1 for the JSF project.. I would like to fix this and re-spin the M2 build. This should not affect the smoke test results of other subprojects.


From: David M Williams [mailto:david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx]
Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:41 PM
[wtp-releng] Status of 3.1 M2?


Well, the JUnit numbers did better (though maybe because of a Did-Not-Finish for some suites ... that's usually caused from a hang, though can be from unexpectedly long tests ... I think our limit is currently 2 hours per suite ... 4 hours total).

But, I have another concern.

According to the "versioning report" there are 8 bundles where the 3.0.2 _service_ has not been put into our 3.1 (HEAD) branch yet.
If it is not obvious, this part of the versioning report is not about some technical rules we should follow, but indicates our 3.1 builds will perform "worse" than our 3.02 builds

(at least for what ever bugs were fixed in 3.0.2).

What's up with that? Even if we are "on time" I don't think we have accomplished "predictable deliveries".

What shall we say when we announce M2? That is. how should we phrase this to the Eclipse community of (early) users and adopters?

Will the Project Leads of these following bundles (or component owners) please suggest appropriate wording?
(I have not included, in this list documentation bundles nor test bundles, nor bundles that have "qualifier only"
increases ... which at least means extra code and not missing code !

Thanks for any suggestions.


   1.2.0.v200807211450 (current)
   1.2.1.v200807292117 (reference)


   1.0.0.v20080605 (current)
   1.0.100.v200808071446 (reference)

   1.1.0.v20080515 (current)
   1.1.101.v20080828 (reference)

   1.1.0.v20080605 (current)
   1.1.3.v20080915 (reference)

   1.0.0.v20080605 (current)
   1.0.100.v200808071446 (reference)

   1.1.0.v20080606 (current)
   1.1.102.v20080909 (reference)

   1.1.0.v20080610 (current)
   1.1.2.v20080909 (reference)

   1.1.0.v20080606 (current)
   1.1.101.v20080909 (reference)

wtp-releng mailing list

Back to the top