|Re: [wtp-pmc] Need PMC opinions on changing type of review for CQ #11306 (Node.js v.4.4.3)|
yes, it looks like you have a reason to tell this, but I think like it's better to ask Sharon (or other authority of Eclipse IP Team) for the comments.
I've included Sharon Corbett to the CC's list. Sharon, could you please put your comments on this thread?
Personally me - I don't see a reason to change the type of JSDT and/or WTP project just because we have to review "an executable" that we want to make possible to use and re-distribute in JSDT project. However the the IP due diligence is to be done for that "executable" itself, for sure, in way of License Compatibility Review.
Sharon Corbett clearly told us that field "Project: Type A (or B)" doesn't mean "change JSDT Project to be a Type A (or B) if it's not", but it does mean the only "Type of Review for the certain CQ will be of Type A (or B)" - so no changes on JSDT project were proposed. See her comment #13 for CQ#11306: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11306#c13 :
As you may be aware, the Eclipse Foundation has recently made changes to its
In other words, "Project: Type A" indicates the way of reviewing the subject of the CQ (Node.js executable in our case) - it doesn't change anything on JSDT Project itself.
However, if I'm wrong and misunderstood the meaning of those "Type A review" and "Type B review" - definitely we have to ask a question to Eclipse IP Team for the explanation.
Thanks for pointing this.
On 12/02/2016 08:54 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
Back to the top