As far as I understand it's all about the type of review for the
CQ's subject. It shouldn't change the type of the project the CQ
is created for.
On 12/01/2016 09:22 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
I don't have a vote here but I'm all for it ;)
But is this not about changing the type of project
rather than review ?
i.e. by doing Type A on a CQ then the release of
JSDT is going to be a Type A not a Type B and that has a
cascading effect on those including it (i.e. WTP and WTP
I still think this is a good idea I just want to
make sure everyone is aware of the implications and it is
not just about this single review.
Dear WTP PMC members,
JSDT project aims to redistribute Node.js v.4.4.3 (and
later) executables in order to make it possible to run TS
Server  and/or other software to provide different kind
of language related services, like content assisting,
validation and so on on user's machines independently of
There are some changes happening on Eclipse IP Policy ,
so now there are to types of review available:
- Type A – License Compatibility Review Only (New)
- Type B – Full Review (License Compatibility, Provenance
Check, Code Scanned for Anomalies)
With all these changes, we'd like to change the type of
the review for CQ #11306  from "B" (Full Review, in
which it was initially introduced) to "A" (License
Compatibility Review"), which, in our opinion, is the most
suitable for our needs.
Could you please reply with your vote "+1" for such a
change or "-1" against it?
- node.js, Version: 4.4.3
- TypeScript, Version: 1.8.10
- Eclipse Foundation IP Policy
Thanks in advance,
wtp-pmc mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password,
or unsubscribe from this list, visit