[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ui-best-practices-working-group] [ide-dev] Working sets (WAS: Re: Java IDEs comparison)

+1 Let¹s find that bug and get it fixed. It¹s one of the few things I miss
when using the Project Explorer, which we do with CDT.

On 2016-09-14, 1:35 PM,
"ui-best-practices-working-group-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Carsten
Reckord" <ui-best-practices-working-group-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
reckord@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Regarding the use of working sets: same here.
>
>> So -related but other topics- why keeping various inconsistent
>>explorers,
>> where we could all align on the Project Explorer (and its excellent
>>CNF) ?
>> Even if it's not about removing them, every perspective should question
>> whether the Project Explorer would be better than a *DT specific one.
>
>I'd love that. But - going back from there to working sets - I find it
>currently very impractical to use with working sets, specifically because
>it doesn't have the automatically managed "Other Projects" set for
>projects that aren't in any working set. There's a bug for that
>somewhere, but I can't seem to find it right now :(
>_______________________________________________
>ui-best-practices-working-group mailing list
>ui-best-practices-working-group@xxxxxxxxxxx
>To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>from this list, visit
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ui-best-practices-working-group