Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tycho-user] Discovery URL from feature.xml not reflected in content.xml

Thanks for your feedback on the planned improvements. However they would be more valuable on the bug(s) they apply to. By the time I'll get around to working on them, I'll probably have forgotten about this e-mail.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: tycho-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tycho-user-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andreas Sewe
> Sent: Freitag, 12. Juli 2013 12:19
> To: tycho-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [tycho-user] Discovery URL from feature.xml not reflected in
> content.xml
> Tobias oberlies wrote:
> > Andreas Sewe wrote:
> >> Well, what I don't get is why something that was part of the unit (being
> >> declared in the unit's feature.xml [1]) got moved to the
> >> repository-header level.
> >
> > I think what is wrong here is that it is possible to specify repository URLs in
> features. I think this is a historic relict of the old update manager, and p2 tries
> to make the best of it copying the information to the repository level.
> Agreed. Allowing the feature itself to control this kind of stuff seems
> wrong. Alas, it is the only way I know of to specify discovery URLs.
> Anyway, it seems like I just have to wait some more for this...
> >> Is there any chance that this will be supported in future versions of
> >> Tycho or do I fundamentally misunderstand what eclipse-repository
> does?
> >
> > It is clear that Tycho needs to support some way to specify discovery URLs -
> but I don't think that this will be via the feature.xml format. Instead, there
> are some ideas in p2 to create a new repository descriptor format which
> supports this [1]. Tycho anyway will need a new format for other reasons [2],
> so if [1] doesn't take off, we could also add this feature as follow-up of [2].
> I must admit that I don't like the idea of introducing yet another
> descriptor format in general and the one in [1] in particular.
> IMHO, Tycho should either consume formats that are already in existence
> (MANIFEST.MF,, to some extend p2.inf) or simply place
> the information in the pom.xml, e.g., as part of the
> tycho-p2-repository-plugin's <configuration>.
> As the Maven Archiver shows [3], one can convey quite complex
> configuration this way. And piggy-backing onto a format already familiar
> to Tycho users IMHO outweighs a slightly verbose XML syntax (when
> compared to an all-new, specialized descriptor format). Also, the tool
> support (code completion, tooltips) you get through m2e is probably
> better than anything you will get for your new format in the near future.
> But that's just my 2 cents.
> Andreas
> > [1]
> > [2]
> [3] <>
> --
> Codetrails UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
> The knowledge transfer company
> Robert-Bosch-Str. 7, 64293 Darmstadt
> Mobile: +49-170-811-3791
> Managing Director: Dr. Marcel Bruch
> Handelsregister: Darmstadt HRB 91940
> _______________________________________________
> tycho-user mailing list
> tycho-user@xxxxxxxxxxx

Back to the top