[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [tsf-dev] TSF process feedback - part 2
|
Paul,
> Is it actually hybrid? The location says "in person"
Click 'reserve a spot'
Only 967 online spots left!
Who is the potential customer, i.e., the people paying with their attention
and work time?
That's quite unusual as a definition of "customer", but ok; I'm sticking with my previous answer...
It's one definition that fits the open source model.
The major established users are going to stay with the established tools,
those that they have always used.
Yes I expect they will, until they (the people and the tools) are superseded.
Is the market big enough to make it commercially worthwhile
creating better tools?
I suspect that several startups are spending VC money writing
test agents, with conformity checking/generation happening
as a side-effect.
Grok's responses to a few basic questions
https://x.com/i/grok/share/33b5581aa03f493284b661326197609f
I'm not going there :)
No hallucinated references. The ones I checked existed.
Writing conformance statements is a skill that takes
practice to learn and become good enough.
LLMs are very good at analyzing sequences of words.
Why not provide a skills assistant that:
...
This is an interesting idea - I just need to conquer my instinctive suspicion that LLMs are mostly snake-oil.
There is certainly lots of snake-oil salesmen and many
of the claims are very overblown.
As an assistant, LLMs are great.
Just don't depend on them doing everything, which is
what the sales pitch claims.
Simplistic indeed. The first point it makes is mostly incorrect, as far as I can tell. I could also argue with a lot of
the criticisms, but frankly the thought of having to debate with any of the LLM services just makes me depressed.
As somebody who has spent a lot of time doing this stuff,
my main complaint is that the LLM missed a lot of issues.
A more detailed and specific question will fix some of this.
The issues found were valid for text claiming to be a conformance
statement.
--
Derek M. Jones Evidence-based software engineering
blog:https://shape-of-code.com
