A January 11th release date is not possible. We generally run
reviews from Thursday to Wednesday. I don't have a problem make
exceptions, but we also don't generally start a review until the IP
Log has been processed (or at least I have a good feeling that the
IP team will be able to complete their review by the end of the
review period).
I found a problematic library in the project downloads (a version of
jtopen for which I cannot identify a CQ). This needs to be addressed
before we can move forward. I have given instructions to the
developer who submitted the IP Log for review.
Where is the project plan for version 0.8.2?
When does the project intend to graduate? I'd like to see a project
plan in place for version 1.0.
FWIW, the project website is quite nice and informative. I see,
however, on the download page, that you aren't signing your bundles.
There are resources within the Eclipse community that can help you
with this.
Wayne
On 01/04/2013 01:58 AM, Xue Ming Zuo wrote:
David,
Thanks for your prompt response.
The schedule of next release has not yet been established. I
will contact you later if we want to be part of the Kepler
Simultaneous Release.
Best regards,
Eric Xueming Zuo (左学明)
Manager, RBD/RDz Development
IBM China Development Lab (CDL)
' 86-10-82453123 | + zuoxm@xxxxxxxxxx
"In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity." - Albert
Einstein
David M Williams ---2013-01-04 14:33:52---+1 Looks good to me.
Appears many of your features are coming along nicely.
From: David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tools PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2013-01-04 14:33
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] EDT 0.8.2 Release Review Request
Sent by: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 Looks good to me. Appears many of your features are coming
along nicely.
I was going to say "4 incubator releases sounds like a lot, when
are you going to graduate"? Then saw you mention 1.0 which is I
guess your graduation. Will that be your next release? When is
that planned?
Are you going to want to be part of the Kepler Simultaneous
Release? (If so, you're not in aggregation builds yet, are you? Or
have I just lost track?).
Not sure what to say about "code contributions so far only from
IBM". I don't see it as a problem, per se, because I know you are
not "resistant" to new comers/outsiders. But, obviously a good
thing to work toward. If it is a matter of "one producer, many
adopters", perhaps you can convince them to supply unit tests,
since that'd be in their own best business interest to make sure
your code runs as they've adopted it? Other than that, I've never
been very good at "recruiting" ... so not much advice.
Congratulations and best of luck,
From: Xue Ming Zuo <zuoxm@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date: 01/04/2013 12:57 AM
Subject: [tools-pmc] EDT 0.8.2 Release Review Request
Sent by: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Tools PMC,
I'm writing to request your review for the EDT 0.8.2 release.
Attached below is the release review document. The
IP Log is awaiting approval.
(See attached file: EDT 0.8.2 ReleaseReview-010313.odp)
The planned release date of EDT 0.8.2 is Jan 11th, so your prompt
response will be highly appreciated. Thanks.
Best regards,
Eric Xueming Zuo (左学明)
Manager, RBD/RDz Development
IBM China Development Lab (CDL)
' 86-10-82453123 | + zuoxm@xxxxxxxxxx
"In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity." - Albert
Einstein[attachment "EDT 0.8.2 ReleaseReview-010313.odp" deleted
by David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM]
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse
Projects
 |
