Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tools-pmc] Definition about icon to be used for branding

Personally I would recommend using the Eclipse icon for the feature branding.  If every project had its own icon then the various EPP packages and product configurations would have 50-100 different feature icons and it starts loosing its value/meaning.  Despite each project feeling it is special/central, to the end users more often our stuff is just "Eclipse".


On 2011-03-17, at 10:51 AM, David M Williams wrote:

No, no standard icon. You are free to create your own, or, I'd suggest, use the "standard" Eclipse one, if you don't have your own.
As for Provider name, it should not be "" (for anyone). It should be "Eclipse <project name>" ... or, for those in "Tools" TLP, you could say "Eclipse <sub project name>".


From:        Daniel Pastore <kpqb38@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx, Sequoyah Developers <sequoyah-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        03/17/2011 10:45 AM
Subject:        [tools-pmc] Definition about icon to be used for branding
Sent by:        tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi guys,

We from Sequoyah have just moved to Tools project, and we would like to know if is there a standard icon to be used for branding in our plugins/features (that shows in the about screen, for instance).
We used to have a DSDP icon for that, but since we migrated, it doesn't make sense anymore to use it.
Also, we have checked that other subprojects from Tools use "" as provider name property. Should we use this too?


Daniel Pastore

Sequoyah Team
tools-pmc mailing list

tools-pmc mailing list

Back to the top