Re: [tools-pmc] Object Teams proposal

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> There's this line of being welcoming for contributions and diligent. 

The Tools PMC may be overly diligent? Now there's something I thought I'd 
never hear. :) 

And I certainly don't mean to seem less than welcoming! Maybe I've not 
been very clear, so let me try again. 
I think the point we are at in the process is the PMC is being asked "is 
this ready for public review?"
and I'm just saying no, there's some more information needed first. I 
would hope all PMCs would show the same respect to existing Eclipse 
Projects, but if Tools PMC must lead the way ... then so be it. (Another 
thing I thought I'd never hear. (ha ha)). All jokes aside, I suspect there 
are just some things that are obvious to others, that I just need to be 
educated about. I appreciate your patience. 

 





From:
Chris Aniszczyk <zx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Tools PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
10/15/2009 10:10 AM
Subject:
Re: [tools-pmc] Object Teams proposal
Sent by:
tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:35 PM, David M Williams <
david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Doug,

Thanks for stating your position. It is really helpful. And I welcome
hearing others.

I thought I made my position clear in words, but following your directions
...

-1

If the Tools PMC doesn't feel comfortable with the project... it can be 
hosted at the Technology project.

There's this line of being welcoming for contributions and diligent. We 
have to becareful otherwise we'll have a very lonely sandbox in the future 
at Eclipse. 

Cheers, 

-- 
Chris Aniszczyk | EclipseSource Austin | +1 860 839 2465
http://twitter.com/eclipsesource | http://twitter.com/caniszczyk
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc