Re: [tinydtls-dev] Current version of TinyDTLS (Eclipse)

["Francesco Marino" <fr.marino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

tinydtls with micro-ecc in now on Gerrit

On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:00:14 +0200
 Priyanka <priyanka206@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Francesco Marino,
>
> As suggested by Olaf Bergmann and Gaëtan Harter you may 
> contribute it to
> the tinydtls eclipse project.
> If you have a git repo already or sourceforge link, you 
> may share that with
> us.
> In fact, we are on 32-bit processor.
>
> Best,
> Priyanka
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Francesco Marino <
> fr.marino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I tested it with contiki on a cc2538-based board.
> > I have the code on my private repository, how can I 
> > share it with you?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 20:03:11 +0200
> >  Priyanka <priyanka206@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Francesco Marino,
> > >
> > > We have started looking at micro-ecc and tinydtls 
> > > integration. If you have
> > > done it already, it would be interesting for us to test 
> > > it on our board.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Priyanka
> > > On Mar 27, 2017 6:47 PM, "Francesco Marino" 
> > > <fr.marino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > I already integrated micro-ecc in tinydtls, if someone 
> > > is interested, and
> > > > it works pretty well
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:40:24 +0200
> > > >  Olaf Bergmann <bergmann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Gaëtan Harter <gaetan.harter@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > > > Maybe in 16bit there is a compat "using the 8bit mode 
> > > > > but it is slow
> > > > >
> > > > > > and not optimized".
> > > > > I would guess that this was acceptable and could be 
> > > > > optimized if really
> > > > > needed.
> > > > >
> > > > > To be sure, at the end would you like to get rid of the 
> > > > > current ecc
> > > > >
> > > > > > implementation ?
> > > > > Yes, absolutely.
> > > > >
> > > > > Either there could be a backward compat code for 16bit 
> > > > > using the old
> > > > >
> > > > > > version
> > > > > I suppose that micro-ecc in 8bit mode (if such a thing 
> > > > > exists) will
> > > > > still be faster than the old implementation in 16 bit 
> > > > > mode, no? (I may
> > > > > have a 16 bit MCU here so I could check if need be.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Grüße
> > > > > Olaf
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > tinydtls-dev mailing list
> > > > > tinydtls-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, 
> > > > > or unsubscribe
> > > > > from this list, visit
> > > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tinydtls-dev
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > tinydtls-dev mailing list
> > > > tinydtls-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, 
> > > > or unsubscribe
> > > > from this list, visit
> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tinydtls-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > tinydtls-dev mailing list
> > tinydtls-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, 
> > or unsubscribe
> > from this list, visit
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tinydtls-dev