Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release Review

[Ricardo Balduino <balduino@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, we are (from 1.5.0.3 to 1.5.0.4).

Ricardo.
______________________________________________________

Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
Senior Software Engineer	IBM Rational
Method Architect	Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team

From:	Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:	emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	09/17/2009 01:52 PM
Subject:	Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release Review
Sent by:	technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

We are talking about a +0.0.1 version number increment,
right?

Wayne

Ricardo Balduino wrote:
>
> Wayne,
>
> Thank you for the clarification. This is indeed a maintenance release
> of EPF.
>
> Anne,
>
> Apologies that I got the car in front of the horses. Please cancel
the 
> tentative time slot for the EPF review at this time.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ricardo.
> ______________________________________________________
> Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
>
>                  
> Senior Software Engineer          
       IBM Rational
> Method Architect            
     Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
>
>
>
>
>
> From:                
 Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To:                
 Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc:                
 emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date:                
 09/17/2009 12:05 PM
> Subject:              
   Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release Review
> Sent by:              
   technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Service releases (bug fix releases with no new features) do not require
> a review. Check out exception three in section 6.4 of the development
> process:
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process.php#6_4_Releases
>
> HTH,
>
> Wayne
>
> Ricardo Balduino wrote:
> >
> > PMC,
> >
> > When gathering the information for this release, it occurred
to us
> > that maintenance releases may not required a release review.
> > Is this a correct assumption?
> >
> > We are essentially delivering fixes on the 2 major components:
EPF
> > Composer tool and Process Library.
> > Please refer to project plan for details, located at:
> > 
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=technology.epf
> >
> > And please let us know at your earliest convenience if we should
> > proceed with the Release Review, as we would need to prepare
the
> > project log and slides if affirmative.
> >
> > Thank you  very much,
> > Ricardo Balduino
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
> >
> >                  
> > Senior Software Engineer            
     IBM Rational
> > Method Architect              
   Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:                
 Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM
> > To:                  technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc:                  Per
Kroll/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> > Date:                
 09/16/2009 11:18 AM
> > Subject:                
 EPF Release Review
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Technology PMC,
> >
> > The EPF project team is preparing to release a new version on
October
> > 10 and we kindly request your approval to have a release review
on
> > October 7, as described by the EMO below.
> >
> > Please, do not hesitate to contact us if you have questions or
comments.
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Ricardo Balduino.
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Ricardo Balduino, MSSE            
     
> > Senior Software Engineer            
     IBM Rational
> > Method Architect              
   Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Forwarded by Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM on 09/16/2009
08:39
> > AM -----
> > From:                
 Anne Jacko <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To:                  Ricardo
Balduino/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> > Cc:                  Wayne
Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:                
 09/15/2009 06:07 PM
> > Subject:                
 Re: [eclipse.org-committers] Eclipse 
> Project Reviews
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello Ricardo,
> >
> > We are planning to have reviews on Wednesday, Oct. 7, at 8am
PDT. If
> > everything is ready for your review by Sept. 30 (one week before
the
> > review date), you could have your review then.
> >
> > There are three things we need for the review: 1) PMC approval;
2)
> > approved IP Log, and 3) docuware (slides).
> >
> > This page has a detailed description of the steps in the review
> > process:
> > 
> _http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Review_Information_for_Project_Leads#Release_Reviews_
>
> >
> >
> > If you have any questions after reading the wiki page and referenced
> > documentation, just let me know. Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Anne Jacko _
> > __emo@eclipse.org_ <mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > On Sep 15, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Ricardo Balduino wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello Anne,
> >
> > When are the next Release Review meetings scheduled for (late
> > September / early October)?
> > We have an upcoming release of EPF, and would like to know when
we
> > should present the review.
> > Are the deliverables for the review meeting the same as before
(i.e.
> > slide deck and project log)?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Ricardo Balduino.
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Ricardo Balduino, MSSE            
     
> > Senior Software Engineer            
     IBM Rational
> > Method Architect              
   Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > technology-pmc mailing list
> > technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
> >  
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>   
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc