Re: [technology-pmc] Re: EPF Release Review

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Service releases (bug fix releases with no new features) do not require 
a review. Check out exception three in section 6.4 of the development 
process:

http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process.php#6_4_Releases

HTH,

Wayne

Ricardo Balduino wrote:
> PMC,
>
> When gathering the information for this release, it occurred to us 
> that maintenance releases may not required a release review.
> Is this a correct assumption?
>
> We are essentially delivering fixes on the 2 major components: EPF 
> Composer tool and Process Library.
> Please refer to project plan for details, located at: 
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=technology.epf
>
> And please let us know at your earliest convenience if we should 
> proceed with the Release Review, as we would need to prepare the 
> project log and slides if affirmative.
>
> Thank you  very much,
> Ricardo Balduino
> ______________________________________________________
> Ricardo Balduino, MSSE
>
> 	 
> Senior Software Engineer 	IBM Rational
> Method Architect 	Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
>
>
>
>
>
> From: 	Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM
> To: 	technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 	Per Kroll/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> Date: 	09/16/2009 11:18 AM
> Subject: 	EPF Release Review
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Technology PMC,
>
> The EPF project team is preparing to release a new version on October 
> 10 and we kindly request your approval to have a release review on 
> October 7, as described by the EMO below.
>
> Please, do not hesitate to contact us if you have questions or comments.
> Thank you,
>
> Ricardo Balduino.
> ______________________________________________________
> Ricardo Balduino, MSSE 	 
> Senior Software Engineer 	IBM Rational
> Method Architect 	Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
>
>
>
>
> ----- Forwarded by Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM on 09/16/2009 08:39 
> AM -----
> From: 	Anne Jacko <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: 	Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: 	Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 	09/15/2009 06:07 PM
> Subject: 	Re: [eclipse.org-committers] Eclipse Project Reviews
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hello Ricardo,
>
> We are planning to have reviews on Wednesday, Oct. 7, at 8am PDT. If 
> everything is ready for your review by Sept. 30 (one week before the 
> review date), you could have your review then.
>
> There are three things we need for the review: 1) PMC approval; 2) 
> approved IP Log, and 3) docuware (slides).
>
> This page has a detailed description of the steps in the review 
> process: 
> _http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Review_Information_for_Project_Leads#Release_Reviews_ 
>
>
> If you have any questions after reading the wiki page and referenced 
> documentation, just let me know. Thanks.
>
>
> Anne Jacko _
> __emo@eclipse.org_ <mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On Sep 15, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Ricardo Balduino wrote:
>
>
> Hello Anne,
>
> When are the next Release Review meetings scheduled for (late 
> September / early October)?
> We have an upcoming release of EPF, and would like to know when we 
> should present the review.
> Are the deliverables for the review meeting the same as before (i.e. 
> slide deck and project log)?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ricardo Balduino.
> ______________________________________________________
> Ricardo Balduino, MSSE 	 
> Senior Software Engineer 	IBM Rational
> Method Architect 	Rational Method Composer (RMC) Team
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>