Re: [technology-pmc] Requesting approval for code contributions?

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I've set the approved flag for each of these in Bugzilla.

Wayne

Abel Muiño Vizcaino wrote:
> This is the initial list of patches that we would like PMC approval 
> for. Unfortunately, they've been committed before realizing the note 
> on the IP poster:
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=255843
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=255573
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=255713
>
> I'll ask PMC approval for other attachments as we process them.
>
> El 27/11/2008, a las 16:21, Wayne Beaton escribió:
>
> > Abel Muiño Vizcaino wrote:
> > > There is currently a flag on bugzilla (in the attachmen details) for 
> > > "review". I'm not sure if that's useful for this case. Otherwise, 
> > > maybe we can manually CC this list on bugzilla when requesting a 
> > > review and the PMC can remove it after approving.
> > Manually adding technology-pmc on the CC is what I have in mind 
> > (don't do it now, it won't work yet). Again, the idea is that someone 
> > like yourself can use this mechanism to ask a question of the PMC 
> > without having to listen to everything else we're chatting about (I 
> > understand that email volume is a sensitive issue).
> > > On the other hand, I've kept looking at IP information and found that:
> > > "For simple bug fixes and minor enhancements contributed under the 
> > > Eclipse Foundation Terms of Use, PMC and EMO approval is not required."
> > > http://www.eclipse.org/legal/committerguidelines.php
> > >
> > > ... which is the opposite of what's written on the top of the IP 
> > > Poster.
> > > http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf
> > I have filed a Bug 256789 [1] (and copied you on it) asking for 
> > clarification.
> > > The list of bugs with patches is currently 15 
> > > (http://tinyurl.com/iam-patches) so once we have cleared if they 
> > > need PMC approval or not, and how to request it, we will start 
> > > processing them.
> > Let's see what happens with the bug. In the meantime, give us the bug 
> > numbers and I'll start going through them. In the worst case, you'll 
> > have explicit PMC approval when you don't need it.
> > > Thanks!
> > You're welcome.
> > _______________________________________________
> > technology-pmc mailing list
> > technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc