Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need two mailing lists?

If we do change it, you would still be able to subscribe to the technology-pmc list. You just wouldn't have to.

Wayne

Abel Muiño wrote:
As a project lead with little background knowledge of the eclipse foundation, the transparency of this list has helped me a lot in getting a better idea of the pmc andits responsabilities. It also allowed me to participate in conversations that I would otherwise have missed.

This said, we (PLs) could probably live without receiving the automated messages.

El 23/10/2008, a las 20:32, Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:

The technology-pmc mailing list is turning into a fairly high-volume list as the PMC uses it for all communication amongst its members. Most of that communication is not of general interest and is potentially causing undue stress on the project leaders who have been compelled to join the list so that they may be privy to communication from the PMC to the projects.

I'd like to propose that we split the list.

The technology-pmc list will remain as it is. It will be primarily for communication between PMC members and for others to pose questions directly to the PMC. Anybody can subscribe.

The technology-projects list will be for communication between the PMC and the various technology projects. We would require that each project lead subscribe to this list.

Thoughts?

Wayne
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc



Back to the top