| Re: [swordfish-dev] RE: Alternatives for WSDL selection from registry |
hi all!
why do not use variant from BPEL Designer?
see attached image - choosing type of location for import.
br,
alex
Friday, August 28, 2009, 5:29:06 PM, you wrote:
ET> of course A1 more easy for me, but
ET> ok, if all think that A2 is better, I try to implement it quickly.
ET> and start right now.
ET> ________________________________________
ET> From: swordfish-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
ET> [swordfish-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oliver Wolf [oliver.wolf@xxxxxxxxx]
ET> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 4:55 PM
ET> To: Swordfish Developer Discussions
ET> Subject: [swordfish-dev] Alternatives for WSDL selection from registry
ET> Fellow Swordfishers,
ET> as discussed before, I see two ways to improve usability of the ³select WSDL
ET> from registry² interface.
ET> Alternative 1 (minimal effort):
ET> -------------------------------
ET> Leave everything as it is, but add a text message describing the current
ET> state of the registry (see mockup Alternative1.png).
ET> The text message to be displayed depends on the following conditions:
ET> 1. If no registry URL has been entered in the Swordfish preferences:
ET> "Please setup a registry URL in Preferences->Swordfish->Registry."
ET> 2. If a registry URL has been entered, but communication failed:
ET> "The Service Registry is unavailable. Please check the URL in
Preferences->>Swordfish->Registry and make sure that the Service Registry is
ET> running."
ET> 3. If the Service Registry returns an empty list of registered services:
ET> "The Service Registry does not contain any entries."
ET> However, showing the registry entries directly on the wizard pane is not a
ET> good idea, IMHO. If the list is long the small size of the selection box
ET> makes it cumbersome to use and handling communication errors is problematic.
ET> This leads me to
ET> Alternative 2:
ET> --------------
ET> Analogous to selecting a WSDL from the file system, I suggest that we just
ET> add a "Browse..." button and pop up a new dialog that presents the registry
ET> entries. If the registry does not contain any entries, the list is empty. If
ET> communication fails, an error dialog is shown instead of the selection
ET> deialog. If no registry URL has been entered, the "Service registry" radio
ET> button is inactive. (see mockup Alternative2.png)
ET> Any comments?
ET> Cheers,
ET> Oliver_______________________________________________
ET> swordfish-dev mailing list
ET> swordfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
ET> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/swordfish-dev
--
Best regards,
Alex mailto:atelesh@xxxxxxxxxxxAttachment:
sf_reg_bpel_serv_expl.png
Description: PNG image
