Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [subversive-dev] Status of Logical Model Integration support


As far as I remember this is the only features that weren't implemented. Although I could miss something because I wasn't with the project for several years at the time of "Logical Model Integration support" implementation.

Best regards,
Alexander Gurov.

 16.06.2011 14:36, Biörnstad, Biörn пишет:
Hi Alexander,
I am not sure I understand your answer. The two features you mention, are those the only ones implemented or are they the only ones missing from a full implementation?

From: subversive-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [subversive-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alexander Gurov [alexander.gurov@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 20:33
To: Developers mailing list
Subject: Re: [subversive-dev] Status of Logical Model Integration support

Hello Biörn,

There is a list of an partially unimplemented or implemented not in the best possible way features:

Provide access to remote configurations using the Eclipse File System API in the org.eclipse.core.filesystem plug-in and link this to workspace projects through the ProjectSetCapability (not all methods were implemented)

IChangeGroupingRequestor (probably is implemented not in the best way)
At first glance it is all I could find. Is there something else that prevents you from using Subversive as part of your product?

Best regards,
Alexander Gurov
Subversive Team.

01.06.2011 14:54, Biörnstad, Biörn пишет:
Dear all,

I would like to ask you what the status of Subversive's support for Logical Model Integration (LMI) is, in particular which of the steps in [1] have been completed for Subversive.

The only information I could find on the topic was the Subversive New and Noteworthy for Galileo [2], which states that you have put much effort into supporting LMI. The corresponding bug even states that "... almost all Team API is implemented". However, prototypes on our side did not manage to uncover the complete support of LMI.

In our project, we want to integrate Subversive in our Eclipse product. A special requirement is that end-users will work exclusively with model objects and never see the corresponding workspace resources. Therefore, we would rely on a relatively complete support of LMI on the part of the Team provider. We are considering implementing missing Subversive features if necessary and contributing these back to the project.



subversive-dev mailing list
subversive-dev mailing list

Back to the top