[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [stp-dev] Work items...
|
Hi Adrian,
Related to WSDL, I'm curious to hear your thoughts or plans regarding
WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 support. Is the plan to support WSDL 1.1 first, or
WSDL 2.0 first? Perhaps work on them in parallel?
alex
Adrian Skehill wrote:
Oisin,
I would like to propose the following for items of work that the STP:
-> Continuation of the development of the initial contribution of JAX
WS support. There is only support for a very limited number of tags
presently and this would need to be rounded out quite significantly.
We should also evaluate the suitability of this for addition to the
WTP as it would appear to be also suited to this space.
-> Update of Celtix Exemplar to leverage the STP Deployment Framework
and achieve complete round trip development which would follow on from
one of your work items below.
-> Provision for the addition of a WSDL First editing mode for STP.
This would leverage the WTP WSDL editor but would need to be capable
of integrating with the components within the STP project. I'd like to
spend some up-front time investigating and seeing how best we could
support this.
We are now in the planning stage for our next areas of work so if
people would like to get back to me with their thoughts we can feed
that directly into our planning efforts.
Regards,
Adrian.
Oisin Hurley wrote:
Hi all,
I'm collecting a list of things that we could work on in the near
future - with the intent to produce a definitive list of content for
an M1 release. I've got my list below - in no particular order of
priority - I'd like to see yours ;)
Focus here is on *integration* of subprojects.
-> a core introspector for jaxws contrib
-> a core introspector for tuscany implementation artifacts
-> a means to visualize an assembly in the core model
-> integration of the core and deployment framework
i.e. a way to link services with deployment targets
-> integration of the deployment framework and deployment
aspects of the WTP (work with WTP on this)
At the end of the day we should be able to do a drive-thru of
service -> model -> deploy for a couple of services.
Any thoughts?
--oh
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev