Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [spatial4j-dev] Source headers, about files, etc.
Great, thanks David!

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:48 PM, david.w.smiley@xxxxxxxxx <david.w.smiley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Justin,
Good question.  The copyright notice *must* list at least one copyright holder.  That’d be Voyager Search for you based on my assumption of typical employee/employer agreements.  So if you are adding a new file and thus need a new header then use this: (pasted below).    I’m not sure how the copy-paste will come through via the mail list, mail client, formatting from IntelliJ, etc..  Once there is more than one, we can add “and others”, and optionally choose to spell out some of the additional others, but it’s okay to not list each so long as there is at least one listed.

/*******************************************************************************
 * Copyright (c) 2015 Voyager Search
 * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
 * are made available under the terms of the Apache License, Version 2.0 which
 * accompanies this distribution and is available at
 *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
 ******************************************************************************/

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:31 PM Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi David, quick question about copyright headers. With the move to LocationTech is there a standard header that we should putting on newly created files? Poking around at a few source files I see a few different versions of the copyright notice. 

Thanks!

-Justin

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:18 PM, david.w.smiley@xxxxxxxxx <david.w.smiley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I finished bringing master up to date with the changes that were in the LocationTech-Contrib2 branch.  Notes:
* a git comment said I bumped the version to 1.0-SNAPSHOT but I didn’t actually; that’s erroneous.  I kept the same maven coordinates & version for now; that’s a separate conversation/decision.
* don’t be alarmed at notice.md saying this project is EPL licensed.  It’s boilerplate that establishes a default that can be overridden — and we do in about.md, which is furthermore re-iterated at the top of every source file.

In addition, Eclipse legal recently made the decision that projects are no longer required to list contributors at the top of source files!  The rationale in essence is that this is what source control is for.  Officially this was decided here: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=435933 which I found out about on the location-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list.  I was quite happy to remove them :-).  But I did ensure we have a commit with it in previously since the LocationTech transition made a new revision tree root that makes finding history before this event hard to tie together.

~ David
--
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker

_______________________________________________
spatial4j-dev mailing list
spatial4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/spatial4j-dev

_______________________________________________
spatial4j-dev mailing list
spatial4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/spatial4j-dev
--
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker

_______________________________________________
spatial4j-dev mailing list
spatial4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/spatial4j-dev

Back to the top