Re: [science-iwg] Committer representation on the Steering Committee

[UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

+1

Except a few representatives of Oracle or IBM, other members in the Steering Committee of LocationTech http://www.locationtech.org/steeringcommittee seem to represent the Academic/SME sector, too, so in Eclipse terms are likely to be Individual Committers, right? Especially at OCG which through JSRs 275-363 I have been in close relation to, there are significantly more Academic or Research members than individuals or those employed by governments or large companies. 

It is likely similar here.

Beside my aim to be Participating Member in the Science WG, depending on how many Individual Committers are planned here, I'd also be happy to join the Steering Committee.

Regards,

Werner

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 15:37:27 +0200
From: Philip Wenig <philip.wenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Committer representation on the Steering
        Committee
Message-ID: <5368E597.8030202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"

sounds good


Cheers,
Philip

Am 06.05.2014 13:21, schrieb Matt.Gerring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> Fine Andrew - thanks
>
> *From:*Jay Jay Billings [mailto:jayjaybillings@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* 06 May 2014 11:28
> *To:* Science Industry Working Group
> *Subject:* Re: [science-iwg] Committer representation on the Steering
> Committee
>
> I think it is a good idea.
>
> Jay
>
> On May 6, 2014 5:24 AM, "Andrew Ross" <andrew.ross@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:andrew.ross@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> One item you might have noticed in the comments when we were shaping
> the charter was to include committer representation on the Steering
> Committee. This slipped through the cracks and I propose we  add it in
> before launch.
>
> It's worth noting, committers been active & greatly valued
> contributors in the LocationTech working group's Steering Committee
> and similarly on the Eclipse Foundation board itself.
>
> If this sounds good to everyone, I'll propose a change.
>
> Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> science-iwg mailing list
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> science-iwg mailing list
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr. Philip Wenig

http://www.openchrom.net

https://www.xing.com/profile/Philip_Wenig
http://de.linkedin.com/pub/philip-wenig/2a/4a8/877
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-iwg/attachments/20140506/7a6e3eaf/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg


End of science-iwg Digest, Vol 16, Issue 6
******************************************