Re: [rt-pmc] Updated charter

[Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I avoided the word MUST for using OSGi as the modular technology of the RT projects.  I wanted to put a bullet in there about developing OSGi technologies as one option for a modular runtime, but I think it should obviously be open to other technologies.

Tom



Mike Milinkovich ---11/20/2013 10:56:57 AM---On 20/11/2013 11:54 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote: > The scope section seems ill worded, and too focused

From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date: 11/20/2013 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [rt-pmc] Updated charter
Sent by: rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

On 20/11/2013 11:54 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
> The scope section seems ill worded, and too focused on a happy world 
> with everything under the Eclipse umbrella using Equinox + OSGi.
>
> While the jetty project make efforts to expose their artifacts in OSGi 
> friendly ways (manifest + p2 repos), we do not use OSGi internally, 
> even for our own module system.

...and the same is obviously true of Vert.x as well.

-- 
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc