| Good point. I'll take a look.
Greg On May 31, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Chris Recoskie wrote: I should also point out that there are a lot of fixed bugs owned by the inbox. That shouldn't typically happen. If you are going to mark a bug as fixed then it should usually be assigned to someone that fixed it. I can see it being assigned to the inbox only when a bug appears magically fixed at some point in the past, and you're not sure who did it, when, or how.
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto
<graycol.gif>Chris Recoskie---05/31/2010 11:48:27 AM---Hmm... Well it seems at some point a bugzilla inbox was created for PTP. That
<ecblank.gif>
From: | <ecblank.gif>
Chris Recoskie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA |
<ecblank.gif>
To: | <ecblank.gif>
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
<ecblank.gif>
Date: | <ecblank.gif>
05/31/2010 11:48 AM |
<ecblank.gif>
Subject: | <ecblank.gif>
[ptp-dev] bugzilla inbox |
<ecblank.gif>
Sent by: | <ecblank.gif>
ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hmm...
Well it seems at some point a bugzilla inbox was created for PTP. That isn't a bad thing, but I didn't know about it, so I haven't been listening to it.
At the same time, for some reason I also am no longer the default assignee or QA contact for RDT bugs. As a result, a bunch of RDT bugs have come in over time, and I've had no idea.
I am trying to triage the backlog, and am now listening to the inbox.
Can we make it so that I'm at least the QA contact on the RDT bugs?
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
|
