Re: [ptp-dev] bugzilla inbox

[Chris Recoskie <recoskie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I should also point out that there are a lot of fixed bugs owned by the inbox. That shouldn't typically happen. If you are going to mark a bug as fixed then it should usually be assigned to someone that fixed it. I can see it being assigned to the inbox only when a bug appears magically fixed at some point in the past, and you're not sure who did it, when, or how.

===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto

Chris Recoskie---05/31/2010 11:48:27 AM---Hmm... Well it seems at some point a bugzilla inbox was created for PTP. That

From:	Chris Recoskie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
To:	ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	05/31/2010 11:48 AM
Subject:	[ptp-dev] bugzilla inbox
Sent by:	ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Hmm...

Well it seems at some point a bugzilla inbox was created for PTP. That isn't a bad thing, but I didn't know about it, so I haven't been listening to it.

At the same time, for some reason I also am no longer the default assignee or QA contact for RDT bugs. As a result, a bunch of RDT bugs have come in over time, and I've had no idea.

I am trying to triage the backlog, and am now listening to the inbox.

Can we make it so that I'm at least the QA contact on the RDT bugs?

===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev