[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [pdt-dev] official release of maintenance for PDT 2.0
- From: "Roy Ganor" <roy@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:31:05 +0300
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Thread-index: AcnIHqc/7OrGWNmATiCsJOEAPE5pfQA9Q7gw
- Thread-topic: [pdt-dev] official release of maintenance for PDT 2.0
Since the last 4 integration builds of PDT 2.0.1 are identical, i.e.
nothing has been changed lately I think that we can say that people were
playing with it enough.
+1 for promotion,
If there are no errors on this build we will promote it on April 30,
around 17:00 (GMT+2)
From: pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Nick Boldt
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 7:30 PM
To: PDT Developers
Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] official release of maintenance for PDT 2.0
That's not really the way the Eclipse Development Process works:
maintenance != new features. That said, "urgently needed" can be
interpreted as "this missing functionality makes the release unusable"
and therefore justifies the change. But IANAL, TINLA, and my
interpretation of the EDP should not be considered a recommendation. :)
FWIW, I've been using Eclipse 3.5 for months now, and it's pretty
stable. The new p2 stuff is worth looking at too.
In lighter news, I have a candidate PDT 2.0.1 build available for the
dev team to review and publish if satisfied. I fixed the problem w/ jar
signing - it was still set to use Alon's credentials so it was unable to
ssh the Master.zip to build.eclipse.
Kirchner Mark wrote:
>> After all, the maintenance branch is only for urgent bug fixes,
> Slightly off-topic, but I have to take the opportunity:
> Since "urgent" seems to be equal to "none at all" during the last 3
months (or so), I consider this "only urgent bug fixes"-constraint a bit
problematic: All the "nice" fixes (e.g. code-completion) seem to happen
in the 2.1-branch only, which is Eclipse 3.5 only, which I won't be able
to use in a production environment.
> So, a pretty-please to the devs: Since Eclipse 3.4 is the
current/stable/production-ready release, please consider backporting not
only the "urgent" fixes but at least also the "it's really ugly without
> Mark Kirchner
Nick Boldt :: http://wiki.eclipse.org/User:Nickb
Release Engineer :: Eclipse Modeling & Dash Athena
pdt-dev mailing list